Jeremy Hunt: I’d back no-deal Brexit with ‘heavy heart’


Jeremy Hunt has said he would back a no-deal Brexit with a “heavy heart” but would, unlike Tory rival Boris Johnson, not commit to a deadline for leaving.

He told the BBC leaving the EU was a “democratic promise” that must be kept, whatever the economic repercussions.

But he said the quickest way to leave was via a new deal and guaranteeing a specific exit date was a “fake debate”.

The leadership candidates have also defended their plans for more spending on public services and tax cuts.

Mr Johnson, who is the frontrunner in the race to be the new Conservative leader, and the UK’s next prime minister, told Sky News he would be prepared to borrow more to spend on vital national infrastructure.

He told the Sophy Ridge programme there was up to £25bn “available” in the short term, due to the improved state of the public finances, which “we intend to use” on education, policing and broadband rather than reducing the deficit.

  • Tory leadership rivals pledge to safeguard union
  • Hunt ‘could withhold part of EU divorce bill’
  • Hunt ‘would give Johnson cabinet job’

Mr Hunt told the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show he would also use the “war chest” built up by Chancellor Philip Hammond but conceded some of his spending priorities would “have to wait” if the UK left without a deal – as the money would be needed to support businesses affected.

‘Drift and dither’

The 160,000 Conservative Party members will begin voting next week and Theresa May’s successor is expected to be announced on 23 July.

The issue of when the UK leaves the EU remains a key dividing line in the contest.

Asked to guarantee that Brexit would happen by the end of 2019, Mr Hunt insisted the UK would leave sooner under his leadership as he was best placed to get an improved deal that could break the impasse in Parliament.

While a no-deal Brexit must be a last-resort, he said the UK would make a success of it and no-one should doubt his willingness to go down that route if necessary.

“The difference between me and Boris is not as big as people are saying,” he said. “At the beginning of October, if there is no prospect of a deal that can get through parliament, then I will leave at the end of October because that is our democratic promise to the British people.”

Mr Johnson said he would take “personal responsibility” for ensuring the UK leaves by 31 October, with or without a deal, as the current “drift and dither” could not continue.

Asked whether he was willing to suspend Parliament to force through a no-deal exit, he said he did not “like the idea” but MPs must accept “responsibility” given the grave situation.

But Tory MP Guto Bebb said neither candidates’ Brexit politics would command legitimacy unless the public were given their say in another referendum.

Tax and spending plans

The candidates continue to be questioned on the affordability of their tax and spending plans.

Mr Hunt claimed the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank had got its figures wrong after it said his plans would “exacerbate” the pressures on the public finances.

Earlier in the Tory leadership race, Mr Hammond wrote to all the contenders to say the next prime minister would potentially have an extra £15bn in “available borrowing capacity” to spend in 2020-21, rising to £25bn in 2023-24, while keeping within the existing fiscal rules.

But he said these sums were dependent on avoiding a no-deal Brexit and warned them against endangering the Tories’ “hard-won reputation for fiscal and economic competence” by abandoning debt and deficit targets.

Mr Hunt said he agreed with his colleague and greater prudence would be required if the UK ended up leaving without a deal.

“If we had a no-deal Brexit, some of these spending commitments would have to wait because you would need to divert money to support businesses up and down the country.

“They would take longer because you would not have that money at your fingertips.”

‘Living within means’

But the foreign secretary said he was still committed, whatever the Brexit outcome, to cutting corporation tax from its current rate of 19% to 12.5%.

“It is not the tax cut people are talking about on the doorstep but it is the one which would fire up the economy in a way that would be helpful in a no-deal context,” he said.

Mr Johnson, whose pledge to reduce the tax burden for those earning up to £80,000 has caused controversy, insisted his immediate focus was on ensuring those at the bottom end of the income scale paid less or no national insurance (NI) altogether.

  • Do Tory leadership tax plans add up?

“I think we should be looking at lifting people on low incomes out of tax, lifting the thresholds for national insurance and I would remind you that that’s where my priority is,” he said.

“When I was mayor of London we led the way, for instance, with the London living wage and I think lifting NI contribution thresholds would be another good thing to do.”

Mr Johnson said he would use the existing “headroom” in the public finances to increase investment in special needs education as part of a £4.6bn boost to overall school funding.

Asked how this would be paid for, he replied: “I’m prepared to borrow to finance certain great objectives but overall we will keep fiscal responsibility and keep going with the general trajectory of ensuring that this country pays its way and lives within its means.

“But you can do that with some sensible tax cuts that will stimulate growth, stimulate enterprise, get more revenue in.”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here